30 Comments
Nov 15, 2023Liked by Nora Hickey, Amaris Ketcham

While it makes perfect sense that Wikipedia reflects the biases of the sources its contributors pull from, I am SMACKED by the disparity in those percentages, both of women represented on Wikipedia and of the gender proportions of the editors. This makes me curious to see what women authors in genres I’m more familiar with (like poetry and nature writing) are as-yet-to-be-included.

Expand full comment

Hey y’all, I wanted to note that I suspect there may be some bias in the reviewing process...and that may be contributing to bias in who’s featured on Wikipedia. What’s considered “notable” seems highly subjective...I’d love to hear about other cartoonists/readers’ Wikipedia writing experiences.

Expand full comment
Nov 16, 2023Liked by Nora Hickey, Amaris Ketcham

Such a great idea, and I am flattered that you included me! I am definitely going to circle back here during winter break!

Expand full comment
Nov 16, 2023Liked by Nora Hickey, Amaris Ketcham

Oh wow, I had no idea of this gender disparity! Love your idea of making a change and am flattered you included me in the list!

Someone else who should definitely be on there is Adrienne Hedger. You’re saying you can’t post about friends though, how would they know?

Expand full comment

Thanks for bringing to this our attention and for offering actionable step.

Expand full comment
Nov 15, 2023Liked by Nora Hickey, Amaris Ketcham

This is great! Yeah, I'm not there either.

Expand full comment

Adding a note so that folks don’t duplicate work--I’ve got a pending review for a wiki page for Kelcey Ervick. This is my new nighttime hobby ☺️

Expand full comment

I love this so much! Thank you, Autobiographix!

Expand full comment